- Our jobs
- Subscribe to RPT
- RPT July / August 2019
- RPT May / June 2019
- RPT March / April 2019
- RPT January / February 2019
- RPT November / December 2018
- RPT September / October 2018
- RPT July / August 2018
- RPT May / June 2018
- RPT March / April 2018
- RPT January / February 2018
- RPT November / December 2017
- RPT September / October 2017
- RPT July / August 2017
- RPT May / June 2017
- RPT March / April 2017
- RPT January / February 2017
- RPT November / December 2016
- RPT September / October 2016
- RPT July / August 2016
- RPT May / June 2016
- RPT March / April 2016
- RPT January / February 2016
- RPT November / December 2015
- RPT September / October 2015
- RPT July / August 2015
- RPT May / June 2015
- RPT March / April 2015
- RPT January / February 2015
- RPT November / December 2014
- RPT September / October 2014
- RPT July / August 2014
- RPT May / June 2014
- RPT March / April 2014
- RPT January / February 2014
- RPT November / December 2013
- RPT September / October 2013
- RPT July / August 2013
- RPT May / June 2013
- RPT March / April 2013
- RPT January / February 2013
- RPT November / December 2012
- RPT September / October 2012
- RPT July / August 2012
- RPT May / June 2012
- RPT March / April 2012
- RPT January / February 2012
- RPT November / December 2011
- RPT September / October 2011
- RPT July / August 2011
- RPT May / June 2011
- RPT March / April 2011
- RPT January / February 2011
The Medscape 2014 Physician Compensation Report Illustrates Effects of Physician Employment Trend, Health Reform Impact
By Bonnie Darves, an independent health care journalist based in the Seattle area
Market forces and the shifting health care delivery landscape in the post-reform era are beginning to have a both visible and, in some cases, almost palpable effect on physician incomes, as evidenced by results of the Medscape 2014 Physician Compensation Report. The 2014 survey results, reported in April and accounting for more than 24,000 respondents in 25 specialties, showed several notable trends, including the following:
Uptick in income for self-employed physicians compared to their employed counterparts.
In primary care, self-employed physicians earned a mean income of $188,000 versus $180,000 for employed doctors. The split is more pronounced when all physicians are accounted for — $281,000 for self-employed and $228,000 for employed.
Top earners show slight shift.
Orthopedics remains the top-paying specialty, at a mean of $413,000, while cardiology is still in second place, at $351,000. But the third-place spot now goes to urology, at $348,000. Gastroenterology is fourth, at $348,000, and radiology fell from third to fifth place, at $340,000 (down from $349,000 in 2013).
Some specialties see declines.
In 2013, nephrology and pathology experienced income declines of 8% and 3%, respectively; and radiology, pulmonary medicine and cardiology incomes all declined 2% compared to the previous year.
Gender income gap still narrowing.
In continuation of a trend, the income disparity between male and female physicians has closed up further. In 2013, male physicians still earned 30% more than female ones, at a mean of $267,000 to $204,000, but that’s a big change since 2010, when the difference was 40% ($225,000 versus $162,000). In internal medicine, the difference was 13% last year. Interestingly, in OB/GYN men earned only $27,000 more than women OBN/GYNs last year ($256,000 versus $229,000), and female urologists actually outpaced their male counterparts slightly.
Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs), health exchanges making inroads.
In a major development, the number of physicians working in the ACO environment has increased dramatically, from 16% in 2012 to 24% last year — and another 10% indicated that they plan to join an ACO. In 2010, that figure was only 8%. In addition, 27% of surveyed physicians indicated they plan to participate in health insurance exchanges (HIEs) soon, but 43% of respondents expected their incomes to decline if they do so.
Primary care incomes see slight increase.
Reflecting a continuing trend, primary care physicians (PCPs) continue to see their compensation steadily increase, albeit slightly. In 2013, both internists and family practice physicians earned an additional 1% over the prior year, at $188,000 and $176,000, respectively. A Medscape article on the report suggested that the new bonus that kicked in thanks to the Affordable Care Act — an additional 10% reimbursement for physicians who care for Medicare patients — likely contributed to the increase for the PCPs.
In other findings, practice setting income disparities persist but were not particularly pronounced. The survey found that physicians in single-specialty and multispecialty group practices earned a mean of $273,000 and $260,000 last year. That’s up from $265,000 the previous year for single-specialty practicing physicians; the multispecialty mean income remained the same, at $260,000.
The mean income was $267,000 for those working in health care organizations, and $198,000 for those in academic and/or government positions. The bottom of the scale went to outpatient-clinic practicing physicians, whose mean income was $189,000.
Following are the mean incomes the Medscape survey found for a handful of other specialties and their differences from 2012:
Nephrology — $242,000 (down 8%)
Cardiology — $351,000 (down 2%)
Gastroenterology — $348,000 (up 2%)
Diabetes and endocrinology — $184,000 (up 3%)
Oncology — $290,000 (up 4%)
General surgery — $295,000 (up 6%)
Rheumatology — $214,000 (up 15%)
On a side note, specialty physicians continue to look to ancillary services as an actual or potential means of maintaining or increasing their income levels. The survey found that in 2013, 33% of orthopedics physicians and 31% of anesthesiologists offer such services, as do 23% of family physicians and 20% of internists.
In another nuanced finding, the percentage of physicians opting for concierge practice increased from 1% in 2012 to 3% in 2013.
Geographic Income Disparities Persist
Not surprisingly, the longstanding physician-income differences among U.S. physicians in certain geographic regions show little sign of shifting (see “Market Watch” in PDF). The Great Lakes, North Central, and Southeast regions commanded the highest incomes, at a mean of $258,000, $257,000, and $255,000, respectively. In the 2013 report, those respective figures were $248,000, $259,000, and $247,000.
The Northeast and Mid-Atlantic regions, at a mean of $239,000 and $240,000, are still the lowest earners. In the Northwest, there was a slight drop in 2013, from a mean income of $249,000 to $247,000. In the Southwest, mean incomes were up slightly, from $242,000 in 2012 to $245,000 in 2013.
Earnings Satisfaction: Small Changes Seen
The good news is the survey found that physician satisfaction with income remains relatively stable overall — 50% of respondents indicated they think they’re fairly compensated, compared to 48% last year. The specialties reporting the highest satisfaction with their income levels included dermatologists (64%), emergency medicine (61%), and pathology and psychiatry (both 59%).
In primary care, 50% of family medicine physicians are happy with their incomes, but only 46% of internists are, too. The specialists least satisfied with their incomes were plastic surgeons (37%), pulmonologists (39%), and endocrinologists and neurologists (both 41%).
As in previous years, female physicians in some specialties continued to report relatively higher satisfaction with their earnings. In the recent survey, for example, income satisfaction was 55% for female gastroenterologists (46% for men), and in OB/GYN, income satisfaction was 47% for women and only 38% for men.
To obtain more details on the Medscape Physician Compensation Report 2014, go to: www.medscape.com/features/slideshow/compensation/2014/public/overview.
For the previous survey results, Medscape Physician Compensation Report 2013, go to: www.medscape.com/features/slideshow/compensation/2013/public.